buc.ci is a Fediverse instance that uses the ActivityPub protocol. In other words, users at this host can communicate with people that use software like Mastodon, Pleroma, Friendica, etc. all around the world.

This server runs the snac software and there is no automatic sign-up process.

Admin email
abucci@bucci.onl
Admin account
@abucci@buc.ci

Search results for tag #ip

AodeRelay boosted

[?]David August ❌👑 » 🌐
@davidaugust@mastodon.online

Proposed Danish copyright law modification that "…protects…general public from…realistic digitally generated imitations of other people's personal characteristics (such as appearance, voice, etc.) without consent" & "…protects performers & artists from…realistic digitally generated imitations of their artistic performance or comedic performance without consent."

Go Denmark!

proposal (in Danish): ft.dk/samling/20241/almdel/KUU

    AodeRelay boosted

    [?]Paul Healey » 🌐
    @Dialectician@universeodon.com

    ‘Guiding our work’

    second bullet point;

    ‘Ideas, facts, and other building blocks of knowledge belong to the public domain and should be free for everyone to use.’creativecommons.org/ai-and-the

    So an ever diminishing few can profit from their utility to protect their programme of profiteering from ecocide?

      AodeRelay boosted

      [?]Radio_Azureus » 🌐
      @Radio_Azureus@ioc.exchange

      Is there anyone with a US vpn or real IP address who wants to check out

      flocksurveillance.org

      The site should show a map of all flock cameras in the USA.

      It won't grand access from other adresses in the IP range

        AodeRelay boosted

        [?]Paul Healey » 🌐
        @Dialectician@universeodon.com

        @campuscodi From digital hegemony to quantum genetic hegemony, all to serve the systems of transhumanist orcs. Living in the shadow of the Hydra’s tech, we have human replacement theory. An unfettered steal and the end of , or the last quest of the Nonce’s vanguard?

          7 ★ 6 ↺
          Beachbum boosted

          [?]Anthony » 🌐
          @abucci@buc.ci

          OK now what? Any reasonable legal regime dictates that an enterprise built on a theft should not be permitted to retain the fruits of that theft. Have we really entered a fully lawless era in the world of business?
          Executives working on AI at Microsoft and OpenAI admitted what its critics have been saying all along: Large language models are predatory pieces of technology that have been built on what a Microsoft executive called “an astonishing theft of unprecedented proportions,” and the “largest theft of labor in human history.” An internal Microsoft document said generative AI products have created a “doom loop” that is killing “the entire web.”
          Nice reporting from @jasonkoebler@mastodon.social https://www.404media.co/doom-loop-openai-and-microsoft-admits-llms-are-destroying-the-web-and-built-on-theft/


            Alex Feinman boosted

            [?]Steve Faulkner » 🌐
            @SteveFaulkner@mastodon.social

            😱 AI: Considerations for people who make decisions

            "It’s genuinely amusing to ask AI vendors whether they’ll indemnify you against intellectual property claims arising from their output. Ask your legal department to look into it."

            berthub.eu/articles/posts/ai-f

              [?]Strypey [they/them, he/him] » 🌐
              @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz

              "Prior to the 1980s, American companies built things domestically, because they risked losing control of the technology if they built things abroad using contractors. But when we tightened IP rules, and embedded those in global trade agreements, it became possible for say, Apple to make its products in China using someone else’s capital while maintaining strict control and high profit margins"

              , 2026

              thebignewsletter.com/p/youll-o

              (1/2)

                4 ★ 3 ↺
                Greg Lloyd boosted

                [?]Anthony » 🌐
                @abucci@buc.ci

                I'm not a lawyer, but based on having worked with a few patent attorneys I'd say there's a pretty good chance that if you enter information into a corporate or API about an invention you're working on, your prompts constitute prior art that could prevent you from ever patenting the invention (or defending the patent if you do succeed in having it granted). I've been told by more than one patent attorney that if you write your idea down on a napkin and leave it somewhere outside your control, that can be cited as prior art and any future patents of that idea might be invalidated on the basis of your errant napkin. Why wouldn't the same hold for prompts willingly entered into an LLM? I'd like to hear otherwise if there are any patent attorneys listening who have experience with this scenario.